A multigenerational perspective is fundamental. Learning Objective: Describe the structure and function of genes. Finally, it should be noted that public health mandates to maintain social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic actually refer to physical distancing and are not intended to further isolate, alienate, or disenfranchise already vulnerable populations. The buffering and skill-building roles of responsive relationships are biologically embedded, and they are essential promoters of healthy development.59 Existing AAP reports on managing perinatal depression,90 supporting grieving children,195 fostering male caregiver engagement,196 partnering with home visiting programs,142 encouraging developmentally appropriate play,74,197 discouraging screen time,125 and promoting shared-book reading67,68 include additional recommendations on ways primary care pediatricians might promote SSNRs. For younger children, these therapies may include attachment and biobehavioral catch-up (ABC),9698 parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT),99102 and child-parent psychotherapy (CPP).103105 For older children, trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) may be beneficial.106,107 The effectiveness of these evidence-based therapies may be reduced if targeted interventions are not used to address emerging areas of risk or if universal primary preventions are not applied as well.59,108 A layered public health approach mirrors the concept of proportionate universalism (see the Appendix for a glossary of terms, concepts, and abbreviations), in which the delivery of universal services is at a scale and intensity that is proportionate to the degree of need.109112 For example, if access to healthy foods is a universal objective, a proportionate response would recognize that some families may only need education about which foods are healthy, whereas some may need education about healthy foods and additional financial resources to purchase those healthy foods, and still others may require education about healthy foods, additional financial resources, and access and/or transportation to stores that sell healthy foods. The medical home recognizes the family as a constant in a child's life and emphasizes partnership between health care professionals and families (as per the National Resource Center for the Patient/Family-Centered Medical Home at the AAP). In the case of toxic stress responses, universal primary prevention means trying to prevent the precipitants of toxic stress responses (eg, advocating to address the spectrum of adversities discussed above) as well as promote healthy, adaptive responses to adversity through the provision of social supports that nurture the development of foundational resilience skills (such as task persistence, curiosity, and self-regulation).16,19,59,83, A public health approach to prevent childhood toxic stress is a public health approach to promote relational health. To translate this relational health framework into clinical practice, generative research, and public policy, the entire pediatric community needs to adopt a public health approach that builds relational health by partnering with families and communities. Proposing that the public health approach also be integrated horizontally across multiple public service sectors (eg, health care, behavioral health, education, social services, justice, and faith communities) because SSNRs are promoted in safe, stable, and nurturing families that have access to safe, stable, and nurturing communities with a wide range of resources and services. Dara's parents both work for a corporation that expects them to work for 50 hours a week. Although intensive, capacity-building efforts for parents and other caregivers with limited executive function skills is beyond the scope of most pediatric settings, providing information and support around basic child-rearing practices and establishing daily routines is a cornerstone of traditional primary care. culturally effective: the family and child's culture, language, beliefs, and traditions are recognized, valued, and respected. Foremost on the advocacy agenda will be the need for serious payment reforms that consider the complexity of care attributable to adverse family and community contexts and include financial supports that incentivize families to engage with an FCPMH.204 Payment reforms need to be sufficient to allow FCPMHs to spend more time with families, function as interdisciplinary teams, integrate into their communitys initiatives and services to support children and families (horizontal integration), and anchor medical neighborhoods that not only foster wellness in childhood but promote positive outcomes across the life span. 3. Chp 2- evolutionary theories Theories of development Theories give a certain perspective Advantages: narrows down way to look at things Negatives: disadvantages to see everything around that one theory (it filters out too many things) Depending on what you are looking at may add different theories NOT JUST 1 5 theories will be seen (removing evolutionary)-Psychoanalytic theories-Humanistic . Along these lines, the Aspen Institute has created the Social Fabric Project to incentivize local projects that prioritize the building of relationships and community connections over a focus on self-absorption and hyperindividualism.183 Similarly, more attention could be given to the built environment and need for public green spaces, such as parks, to promote social cohesion and a sense of community belonging.184,185. Taken together, these diverse lines of inquiry suggest that it may not actually be the wide spectrum of childhood adversity that drives poor outcomes but the degree to which that adversity drives shame, guilt, anger, alienation, disenfranchisement, and degree of social isolation.181,182 If so, the proposed public health approach toward the promotion of SSNRs is needed, not only to buffer adversity and promote resilience but also to begin bridging political, religious, economic, geographic, identity-based, and ideological divides that increase social isolation, encourage tribalism, diminish empathy, and, ultimately, drive poor outcomes in the medical, educational, social service, and justice systems. Second, it applies this EBD framework to better understand the complex relationships among adverse childhood circum-stances, toxic stress, brain architec-ture, and poor physical and mental health well into . Universal screening for prevalent barriers seen in that practice; facilitate, track, and follow-up on referrals offered. The Ecobiodevelopmental Model of Health. ancillary support services (interpretation, telemedicine, transportation, etc) enabling youth with special health care needs to access the many layers of support that they frequently require. See the Appendix for full descriptions of the abbreviations. With almost a century of service to children, families, and communities, the field of pediatrics has made critical contributions at the interface of science and public policy. For children at higher risk for toxic stress responses, targeted secondary interventions with tiered services (eg, HealthySteps84,85) may be needed. This wide spectrum of adversity underscores the fact that ACE scores and other epidemiologically derived risk factors at the population level are not valid or reliable predictors of outcomes at the individual level.56 Toxic stress, by contrast, refers to an individuals physiologic response to these adversities, and biomarkers of this physiologic response have the potential to be more sensitive and specific measures of experienced adversity at the individual level.37 Validated biomarkers also offer transformational potential as measures of responsiveness to specific interventions.37,57 With these applications in mind, the pediatric research community is hoping to develop clinic-friendly, noninvasive biomarkers for different forms and degrees of adversity. An important consideration across many harmed and exploited communities (such as American Indian or Alaska Native populations) is the accumulation of toxic stress responses across generations, sometimes referred to as historical trauma.60 Although higher levels of historical trauma are associated with poorer health outcomes, the science underlying these associations is only now being studied rigorously.61 A detailed discussion of historical trauma and the special needs of these communities is beyond the scope of this policy statement, but the layered, integrated public health approaches presented here to prevent childhood toxic stress and promote relational health might inform efforts to address historical trauma as well. Neurology also plays a role in the biological perspective of psychology. The case studies by Chilton and Rabinowich provide poignant and compelling qualitative data that support an ecobiodevelopmental approach towards understanding and addressing both the complex. Individual variation in biological sensitivity to context (see the Appendix for a glossary of terms, concepts, and abbreviations) contributes to heterogeneity in both responses to adversity and responses to interventions. Relational health is a strengths-based approach because it is focused on solutions: those individual, family, and community capacities that promote SSNRs, buffer adversity, and build resilience.
Preventing Childhood Toxic Stress: Partnering With Families and An ecobiodevelopmental framework sheds new light on the biological basis for persistent disparities in education, poverty, and health. Secondary preventions in the relational health framework are focused on identifying the potential individual, family, and community barriers to SSNRs by developing respectful and caring therapeutic relationships with patients, families, and communities. Andrew Garner, Michael Yogman; COMMITTEE ON PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CHILD AND FAMILY HEALTH, SECTION ON DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS, COUNCIL ON EARLY CHILDHOOD, Preventing Childhood Toxic Stress: Partnering With Families and Communities to Promote Relational Health. Provide longitudinal experiences that train residents on how to develop strong, trusted, respectful, and supportive relationships with parents and caregivers. The previous policy statement12 and technical report2 on childhood toxic stress noted the 10 adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) studied in the landmark ACEs Study that began in the 1990s: physical, emotional, or sexual abuse; physical or emotional neglect; problematic parental substance misuse; parental mental illness; parental separation or divorce; intimate partner violence; and an incarcerated house member.23 These adversities are associated with a wide array of negative outcomes in a dose-dependent manner, such that the higher the ACE score (1 point for each category experienced before the age of 18 years), the higher the risk for unhealthy behaviors such as tobacco, alcohol, and other substance use; risky sexual behaviors; and obesity.23,24 Dose-dependent relationships have also been found between ACE scores and several of the leading causes of adult morbidity and mortality,23,24 including cardiovascular disease,25 lung disease,26 liver disease,27 mental illness,28 and cancer.29, These well-established associations between ACEs and poor health outcomes decades later highlight the importance of understanding the biological mechanisms that allow adversity in childhood to get under the skin and to negatively impact life-course trajectories.3036 As discussed in the 2012 AAP technical report,2 toxic stress responses, in which the physiologic stress response to adversity is large, chronic, and unmitigated by social-emotional buffers, are one such mechanism.